During an insurance claim, insureds are sometimes given incorrect information by the insurance company and its agents. Among other things, these misstatements may relate to the terms and requirements of the policy, the safety of the premises, or how repairs must be handled. False statements made in relation to an insurance claim can give rise to a negligent misrepresentation claim. This can be a useful tool in litigation against insurance companies in some circ*mstances.
Although there are “various tort theories” an insurance company can be sued for, it is well known that bad faith is the “most prominent” tort claim that can be asserted.Bock v. Hansen(2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 215, 228.) Generally, an insured cannot sue his or her insurance company for negligence. (Sanchez v. Lindsay Morden Claims Services, Inc. (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 249, 254.) However, negligent misrepresentation is a “different tort” than negligence. (Bock, supra, 225 Cal.App.4th at 227.) Indeed, negligent misrepresentation is “a species of the tort of deceit.” (Id. at 228.)
Under California law, under the right circ*mstances, a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation can be brought against an insurer. Pleading such a claim in litigation against an insurance company can have advantages.
First, negligent misrepresentation claims provide a potentially broader avenue to pursue personal injury claims than a bad faith claim. This is because negligent misrepresentation prohibits “providing false information [which] poses a risk of and results in physical harm.” (Id. at 229.) In one California case, a negligent misrepresentation claim was allowed for personal injuries to an insured who was told by the insurance company adjuster that they were obligated to clean up a tree limb. (Id. at 303-304.) In a bad faith claim, however, certain California case law has indicated that an “economic loss” may be required to recover. (See Richards v. Sequoia Ins. Co.(2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 431, 438.) When personal injuries are involved, a negligent misrepresentation claim may be the most viable claim against an insurance company.
Second, a negligent misrepresentation claim allows for liability against the insurance agent or adjuster that made the misrepresentation. California case law has held that a “cause of action for negligent misrepresentation can lie against an insurance adjuster.” (Id. at 231.)
Finally, a misrepresentation by an insurance company relied on by the insured often trumps unknown terms of the policy contrary to the misrepresentation. Insurance company’s often assert the policyholder’s “duty to read” the policy when relying on terms that the insured did not know about. California Courts, however, recognize that “a very small percentage of policy-holders” actually know the terms of their insurance policy. (Eddy v. Sharp (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 859, 864.) A negligent misrepresentation lies despite unknown policy terms to the contrary because “an insured should be able to rely on an agent’s representations of coverage without . . . examining the relevant policy provisions.” (Bock, supra, 225 Cal.App.4th at 232.)
A negligent misrepresentation claim is not often asserted in bad faith litigation against insurers. It does, however, offer certain advantages. Policyholders who have relied on false information by their insurance company, and were harmed because of it, should consider such a claim.
Click below to share this article:
FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW FOR A FREE CASE REVIEW
Recent Posts
What is a Catastrophic Injury
Is It Better to Hire a Personal Injury Lawyer or Handle the Case Alone
Lyft Accident Attorney
How to Document Evidence After a Car Accident
How to Deal With Insurance Companies After a Car Accident
Why You Need a Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer for Your Case
Strict Liability Rule for Dog Bites in California
How Long Does a Personal Injury Lawsuit Take in California
COVID-19 Vaccine Religious Exemption Attorney in Los Angeles
California Discovery Rule
Who’s At Fault in a Self-Driving Car Accident in Los Angeles, CA
Proving Negligence in Personal Injury Cases
Common Mistakes to Avoid When Dealing With Insurance Companies
What Is ‘Pain And Suffering’ In A Personal Injury Case?
How to Find a Los Angeles Wrongful Death Attorney in 2013
How To Make Sure Teenage Drivers Are Careful
Simple Tips to Make Sure Your Car is Safe
Simple Tips to Avoid Slip and Fall Injuries
How To Get Long-Term Disability Benefits For Back Problems in Los Angeles?
Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorneys: Your Ultimate Hiring Guide
PreviousObtaining Punitive Damages Against An Insurance Company Under California Law
NextCalifornia Law Imposes On Insurance Companies A Duty To Settle Anytime There Is A Risk Of A Verdict In Excess Of Policy Limits
RESULTS
$15,000,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE / BAD FAITH
$97,284,817
Class Action / Rest Break
$10,000,000
Bad Faith
$8,820,000
Brain Injury
$7,500,000
Medical Malpractice
$1,000,000
Construction Defect
View All
INJURED ? CALL (213) 212-6946
or
FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW FOR A
FREE CASE REVIEW
- NO PRESSURE |
- SPEAK WITH AN ATTORNEY |
- NO HIDDEN FEES |
THE USE OF THE INTERNET OR THIS FORM FOR COMMUNICATION WITH THE FIRM OR ANY INDIVIDUAL MEMBER OF THE FIRM DOES NOT ESTABLISH AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. SENDING TIME SENSITIVE MATERIAL TO THE FIRM VIA THIS MESSAGE, WILL NOT BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FIRM. PROCEED IF YOU’VE READ THIS DISCLAIMER.
RESULTS
$15,000,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE / BAD FAITH
$97,284,817
Class Action / Rest Break
$10,000,000
Bad Faith
$8,820,000
Brain Injury
$7,500,000
Medical Malpractice
$8,250,000
Wrongful Death / Accident
$1,000,000
Construction Defect
View All
INJURED ? CALL (213) 212-6946
or
FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW FOR A
FREE CASE REVIEW
- NO PRESSURE |
- SPEAK WITH AN ATTORNEY |
- NO HIDDEN FEES |
THE USE OF THE INTERNET OR THIS FORM FOR COMMUNICATION WITH THE FIRM OR ANY INDIVIDUAL MEMBER OF THE FIRM DOES NOT ESTABLISH AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. SENDING TIME SENSITIVE MATERIAL TO THE FIRM VIA THIS MESSAGE, WILL NOT BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FIRM. PROCEED IF YOU’VE READ THIS DISCLAIMER.